1. Introduction: The Geopolitical Context of Nuclear Arsenals and African Security
The interplay between nuclear arsenals and African security is a complex and multifaceted issue, situated within the broader framework of global geopolitics. Nuclear weapons, as instruments of strategic power, have profoundly shaped international relations since their inception in the mid-20th century. For Africa, a continent with no nuclear-armed states but significant geopolitical relevance, the presence and proliferation of nuclear arsenals globally have direct and indirect implications for its security, stability, and development. This article explores the geopolitical dynamics of nuclear arsenals, their historical and contemporary relevance to African security, and the continent’s position within the global nuclear order, emphasizing key concepts such as deterrence, proliferation, disarmament, and regional stability.
· The Global Nuclear Order and Its Geopolitical Foundations
In the post-World War II era, major powers, especially the United States and the Soviet Union, developed and deployed nuclear weapons, establishing a bipolar structure of international relations and dominating the Cold War. The destructive potential of nuclear weapons introduced the concept of mutual assured destruction (MAD), which underpinned strategic deterrence and prevented direct large-scale conflict between superpowers. In 1968, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) formalized the division between nuclear-weapon states (NWS) and non-nuclear-weapon states (NNWS). The treaty recognized the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom as legitimate nuclear powers. The treaty urged other states, including African states, to forgo nuclear ambitions for access to peaceful nuclear technology.
This global nuclear order has created a hierarchical structure in international relations, where nuclear-armed states wield disproportionate influence. For African nations, this hierarchy raises questions about sovereignty, security, and the ability to influence global decision-making. The continent’s strategic importance, driven by its vast natural resources, growing population, and geopolitical positioning, makes it a critical theater in the global nuclear calculus, even though no African state possesses nuclear weapons.
· Africa’s Position in the Nuclear Order
Its historical experience with colonialism, its commitment to non-proliferation, and its pursuit of regional security shapes Africa’s engagement with the global nuclear order. The continent has actively sought to remain a nuclear-weapon-free zone, as evidenced by the Treaty of Pelindaba (1996), which established Africa as a nuclear-weapon-free zone (NWFZ). This treaty, signed by 54 African states, prohibits the development, acquisition, or stationing of nuclear weapons on the continent and reflects Africa’s collective stance against nuclear proliferation (African Union, 1996). The treaty emerged from the continent’s historical aversion to external domination and its desire to prevent Africa from becoming a battleground for great power rivalries, as seen during the Cold War proxy conflicts in Angola, Mozambique, and elsewhere.
Despite this commitment, the nuclear policies of external powers indirectly affected Africa’s security. The presence of nuclear arsenals in states like the United States, Russia, China, and others influences global strategic stability, which affects African nations through alliances, arms races, and potential spillover effects. For instance, the deployment of nuclear-capable systems in regions proximate to Africa, such as the Middle East or the Indian Ocean, raises concern about regional instability and the potential for nuclear escalation affecting African states.
Nuclear Arsenals and African Security Challenges
The existence of nuclear arsenals poses several direct and indirect challenges to African security:
1. Geopolitical Tensions and Proxy Conflicts: The global nuclear order often exacerbates geopolitical tensions that spill into Africa. During the Cold War, superpowers supported proxy wars in African states, fueling conflicts that destabilized the continent. While overt nuclear threats were absent, the strategic competition between nuclear-armed states shaped the flow of conventional arms and military support to African factions, as seen in the Angolan Civil War (1975–2002). In the contemporary era, great power competition, particularly between the United States, China, and Russia, continues to influence African security dynamics, with nuclear arsenals serving as a backdrop to military posturing.
2. Proliferation Risks: Although Africa itself is a nuclear-weapon-free zone, the risk of nuclear proliferation in adjacent regions, such as the Middle East, poses a threat. For example, concerns over Iran’s nuclear ambitions or the potential for non-state actors to access nuclear materials could destabilize North Africa or the Horn of Africa, regions already grappling with terrorism and conflict. The smuggling of nuclear materials through African ports or across porous borders remains a persistent concern, given the continent’s strategic maritime routes.
3. Environmental and humanitarian effects: The legacy of nuclear testing by colonial powers, such as France’s tests in the Sahara Desert (Algeria, 1960–1966), highlights the environmental and humanitarian consequences of nuclear activities for African populations. These tests caused long-term health and ecological damage, raising questions about accountability and reparations. Additionally, the potential for nuclear accidents or conflicts involving nuclear weapons could have catastrophic consequences for Africa’s densely populated regions and fragile ecosystems.
4. Economic and Developmental Constraints: The global nuclear arms race diverts resources from development priorities, including those of African nations. The maintenance and modernization of nuclear arsenals by major powers consume vast financial resources, which could otherwise support global initiatives for poverty reduction, climate resilience, and peacekeeping—issues of critical importance to Africa. Moreover, African states investing in peaceful nuclear energy programs, such as South Africa’s Koeberg Nuclear Power Station, face scrutiny and restrictions under the NPT framework, limiting their access to advanced technologies.
Africa’s Role in Global Nuclear Governance
African states have actively engaged in global nuclear governance to advocate for disarmament and equitable security arrangements. The African Union (AU) and individual states have consistently supported calls for nuclear disarmament, emphasizing the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons. At the United Nations, African nations have been vocal proponents of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), adopted in 2017, which seeks a legally binding framework to eliminate nuclear weapons globally. Countries like South Africa, which voluntarily dismantled its nuclear weapons program in the early 1990s, serve as a global model for disarmament and non-proliferation.
However, Africa’s limited economic and military power restricts its influence in global nuclear governance. The continent’s reliance on external powers for security and development assistance often limits its ability to challenge the nuclear policies of major powers. Furthermore, the lack of African representation in key decision-making bodies, such as the United Nations Security Council, undermines the continent’s ability to shape the global nuclear agenda.
2. The Influence of Global Nuclear Arsenals on African Security Dynamics
The global nuclear arsenals, maintained by a select group of nuclear-weapon states (NWS), exert a profound influence on African security dynamics, despite the continent’s status as a nuclear-weapon-free zone under the Treaty of Pelindaba (1996). The policies, strategies, and rivalries of nuclear-armed states indirectly shaped Africa.
Strategic Competition and African Security
Global nuclear arsenals, primarily held by the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom, underpin the strategic competition that defines the international security environment. These arsenals, rooted in the Cold War doctrine of mutual assured destruction (MAD), continue to shape great power rivalries, which spill over into African security dynamics. During the Cold War, Africa became a theater for proxy conflicts fueled by nuclear-armed superpowers, with notable examples including the Angolan Civil War (1975–2002) and the Ethiopian-Somali War (1977–1978). The strategic posturing of nuclear powers, who supplied conventional arms and military support to opposing factions, shaped these conflicts, while not directly involving nuclear weapons.
In the contemporary era, the resurgence of great power competition, particularly between the United States, China, and Russia, continues to influence African security. The presence of nuclear-capable naval forces in strategic maritime zones, such as the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, and the Gulf of Aden, heightens the risk of Africa being drawn into broader conflicts. For instance, the U.S. and Chinese naval deployments in the Horn of Africa, backed by their respective nuclear deterrents, underscore the strategic importance of African maritime routes for global trade and security. These deployments can exacerbate local tensions as African states navigate alliances with competing powers, often at the expense of regional stability.
Moreover, the nuclear postures of major powers influence their military engagements in Africa. Russia’s nuclear arsenal, for example, emboldens its assertive foreign policy, including its expanding military presence in countries like Mali and the Central African Republic through private military companies like Wagner. Similarly, China’s growing nuclear capabilities align with its Belt and Road Initiative, which includes investments in African infrastructure and ports, raising concerns about dual-use facilities that could support nuclear-capable assets. These dynamics place African states in a delicate position, balancing economic partnerships with the risks of entanglement in great power rivalries.
Proliferation Risks and Regional Stability
While Africa remains committed to non-proliferation through the Treaty of Pelindaba, the global nuclear arsenals pose indirect proliferation risks that threaten regional stability. The potential for nuclear proliferation in adjacent regions, such as the Middle East, is a significant concern. For example, Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the ongoing tensions with nuclear-armed Israel could destabilize North Africa and the Horn of Africa, regions already grappling with terrorism, piracy, and conflict (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2022). The smuggling of nuclear materials or technology through African ports, facilitated by weak border controls and corruption, remains a persistent threat. Countries like Somalia and Libya, with fragile governance structures, are particularly vulnerable to exploitation by non-state actors seeking nuclear materials.
Additionally, the global nuclear arms race, including the modernization of arsenals by NWS, incentivizes other states to pursue nuclear capabilities, potentially undermining the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). This dynamic creates a ripple effect, where African states, particularly those with strategic resources like uranium (e.g., Niger, Namibia), face increased scrutiny and pressure to secure their supply chains. The competition for Africa’s uranium resources, critical for nuclear fuel, further complicates security dynamics, as external powers seek to control these assets, often exacerbating local conflicts.
Environmental and Humanitarian Legacies
The historical legacy of nuclear activities by external powers continues to impact African security. France’s nuclear tests in the Sahara Desert (Algeria, 1960–1966) left a lasting environmental and humanitarian toll, with radioactive contamination affecting local populations and ecosystems. These tests, conducted during Algeria’s struggle for independence, highlight the colonial dimensions of nuclear activities in Africa, raising questions about accountability and reparations. The long-term health consequences, including cancer and birth defects, underscore the humanitarian dimension of nuclear legacies, which continue to strain relations between African states and former colonial powers.
In a contemporary context, the potential for nuclear accidents or conflicts involving nuclear weapons poses catastrophic risks for Africa’s densely populated regions and fragile ecosystems. A nuclear incident in a neighboring region, such as the Middle East, could result in radioactive fallout affecting African states, particularly those in North Africa. Moreover, climate change exacerbates these risks, as extreme weather events could complicate disaster response and amplify the environmental impact of nuclear incidents.
Economic and Developmental Constraints
The maintenance and modernization of global nuclear arsenals divert significant financial resources from global public goods, including development aid, peacekeeping, and climate resilience—priorities critical to African security. In 2022, global military expenditure reached $2.24 trillion, with nuclear-armed states accounting for a substantial share. These resources could address pressing African challenges, such as poverty, infrastructure deficits, and conflict resolution, which are central to the continent’s security.
Furthermore, African states pursuing peaceful nuclear energy programs, such as South Africa’s Koeberg Nuclear Power Station, face stringent restrictions under the NPT framework. These restrictions, designed to prevent proliferation, limit access to advanced nuclear technologies, constraining Africa’s ability to leverage nuclear energy for development. The economic burden of complying with international nuclear regulations, coupled with the high costs of nuclear infrastructure, places additional strain on African economies, diverting resources from other security priorities.
Africa’s Role in Global Nuclear Governance
African states have played a proactive role in global nuclear governance, advocating for disarmament and a more equitable nuclear order. The Treaty of Pelindaba, signed by 54 African states, reflects the continent’s commitment to remaining a nuclear-weapon-free zone and preventing Africa from becoming a theater for nuclear competition. South Africa’s voluntary dismantlement of its nuclear weapons program in the early 1990s remains a global exemplar of disarmament, positioning the country as a leader in non-proliferation advocacy.
At the United Nations, African states have supported the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) (2017), which seeks to ban nuclear weapons globally. Countries like Nigeria and South Africa have been vocal proponents of the TPNW, emphasizing the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons. However, Africa has limited influence because of its constrained representation in key decision-making bodies, like the United Nations Security Council, where nuclear-armed states can veto. This structural imbalance limits Africa’s ability to shape the global nuclear agenda, despite its moral and diplomatic contributions.
Contemporary Challenges and Emerging Technologies
The influence of global nuclear arsenals on African security is evolving with the advent of new technologies. Advances in missile defense systems, cyberwarfare, and artificial intelligence introduce new risks of miscalculation or escalation in nuclear strategy. African states with limited technological infrastructure are particularly vulnerable to the destabilizing effects of these developments. For instance, cyberattacks targeting nuclear command-and-control systems could inadvertently involve African states in global conflicts, given the continent’s growing connectivity. Moreover, the proliferation of dual-use technologies, such as drones and hypersonic missiles, complicates the nuclear landscape. These technologies, often deployed by nuclear-armed states in Africa’s vicinity, increase the risk of regional escalation. For example, the use of nuclear-capable submarines in the Indian Ocean could destabilize the Horn of Africa, a region already fraught with conflict.
Future Prospects and Policy Recommendations
Looking ahead, the influence of global nuclear arsenals on African security will depend on several factors:
1. Strengthening Regional Cooperation: The African Union (AU) and regional bodies like ECOWAS and SADC must enhance cooperation to address proliferation risks, secure strategic resources, and prevent Africa from becoming a theater for great power conflicts. Joint initiatives, such as regional counter-terrorism frameworks, can mitigate the threat of nuclear material smuggling.
2. Advocating for Disarmament: African states should continue to leverage their collective voice in international forums, such as the United Nations, to push for nuclear disarmament. Supporting the TPNW and engaging with NWS to reduce arsenals can enhance global stability, benefiting African security.
3. Investing in Nuclear Security: African states must strengthen nuclear security measures, including border controls and port security, to prevent the illicit trafficking of nuclear materials. International partnerships, such as those with the International Atomic Energy Agency, can provide technical assistance and capacity building.
4. Promoting Peaceful Nuclear Energy: Expanding access to peaceful nuclear technology, while adhering to non-proliferation commitments, can support Africa’s development goals. Investments in nuclear energy infrastructure, coupled with international cooperation, can address energy deficits and enhance economic security.
5. Mitigating Environmental Risks: African states should advocate for accountability and reparations for historical nuclear activities, such as France’s tests in Algeria. Regional frameworks for environmental monitoring and disaster preparedness can mitigate the risks of nuclear incidents.
3. African Contributions to Global Non-Proliferation Efforts
Africa’s contribution to global non-proliferation efforts is significant, reflecting the continent’s commitment to preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and promoting a peaceful and secure world. Despite lacking nuclear arsenals, African states have played a pivotal role in shaping the global nuclear order through diplomatic initiatives, regional treaties, and leadership in international forums. The continent’s unique historical experiences with colonialism, resource exploitation, and external military interventions have informed its proactive stance on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation.
The Treaty of Pelindaba: Establishing a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone
One of Africa’s most significant contributions to global non-proliferation is the Treaty of Pelindaba (1996), which established the African continent as a nuclear-weapon-free zone (NWFZ). Signed by 54 African states under the auspices of the African Union (AU), the treaty prohibits the development, acquisition, testing, or stationing of nuclear weapons on African soil (African Union, 1996). The treaty’s origins lie in Africa’s collective response to the nuclear tests conducted by France in Algeria (1960–1966) and the broader Cold War dynamics that threatened to make Africa a battleground for nuclear-armed powers. By creating a legally binding framework, the Treaty of Pelindaba ensures that Africa remains free from nuclear weapons, setting a precedent for other regions and reinforcing the global non-proliferation regime.
The treaty also includes protocols that call on nuclear-weapon states (NWS) to respect Africa’s nuclear-free status and refrain from using or threatening to use nuclear weapons against African states. This commitment enhances regional security and positions Africa as a leader in global non-proliferation efforts. The treaty’s implementation, overseen by the African Commission on Nuclear Energy (AFCONE), demonstrates Africa’s capacity to coordinate and enforce non-proliferation commitments at a regional level. The Treaty of Pelindaba has inspired similar initiatives in Latin America, Southeast Asia, and the South Pacific, underscoring Africa’s influence in global nuclear governance.
South Africa’s Voluntary Nuclear Disarmament
South Africa’s decision to dismantle its nuclear weapons program in the early 1990s stands as a landmark contribution to global non-proliferation. During the apartheid era, South Africa developed a clandestine nuclear weapons program, producing six nuclear warheads by the 1980s. However, in 1989, as the country transitioned to democracy, President F.W. de Klerk initiated the dismantlement of the program, making South Africa the first and only state to relinquish its nuclear arsenal voluntarily. This historic decision was driven by a combination of domestic political changes, international pressure, and a commitment to aligning with global non-proliferation norms, particularly the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).
South Africa’s disarmament process was transparent and verifiable, involving cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to ensure the complete elimination of its nuclear weapons capability. The country’s subsequent accession to the NPT in 1991 and its active participation in the Treaty of Pelindaba solidified its role as a global leader in non-proliferation. South Africa’s experience models other states considering nuclear disarmament, showing that diplomacy and non-proliferation, not nuclear armament, can achieve security. Furthermore, South Africa’s leadership in international forums, such as the NPT Review Conferences, amplifies Africa’s voice in shaping global nuclear policies.
Advocacy in Global Nuclear Governance
African states have consistently advocated for nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation in international forums, leveraging their collective voice to challenge the nuclear status quo. The African Union, alongside individual states like Nigeria, Egypt, and South Africa, has been a vocal proponent of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), adopted by the United Nations in 2017. The TPNW, which seeks a legally binding prohibition on nuclear weapons, aligns with Africa’s humanitarian and security priorities, emphasizing the catastrophic consequences of nuclear weapons use. As of 2025, numerous African states, including South Africa, Nigeria, and Algeria, have ratified the TPNW, reinforcing the continent’s commitment to a nuclear-free world.
At the United Nations General Assembly and NPT Review Conferences, African states have consistently called for the full implementation of the NPT’s disarmament pillar, urging nuclear-weapon states to reduce their arsenals and fulfill their commitments under Article VI of the treaty. The New Agenda Coalition (NAC), which includes Egypt and South Africa alongside other non-nuclear states, has been instrumental in pushing for a balanced approach to the NPT’s three pillars: non-proliferation, disarmament, and peaceful use of nuclear energy. African states have also advocated for equitable access to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, such as energy and medical applications, to support development goals without compromising non-proliferation commitments.
Securing Nuclear Materials and Preventing Proliferation
Africa’s contributions to non-proliferation extend to efforts to secure nuclear materials and prevent their illicit trafficking. The continent is home to significant uranium deposits, particularly in countries like Niger, Namibia, and South Africa, which are critical to the global nuclear fuel cycle. Recognizing the risks of nuclear material diversion, African states have collaborated with the IAEA to strengthen nuclear security measures, including safeguards, physical protection, and export controls. The establishment of AFCONE under the Treaty of Pelindaba facilitates regional cooperation to monitor compliance with nuclear security standards and prevent the misuse of nuclear materials.
African states have also participated in global initiatives such as the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT) and the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), which aim to counter the threat of nuclear terrorism and illicit trafficking. Countries like Kenya and Morocco have hosted IAEA training programs to enhance national capacities for nuclear security, particularly in port and border management. These efforts are critical in regions like the Horn of Africa and the Sahel, where weak governance and terrorist activities heighten proliferation risks.
4. Conclusion: Toward a Secure and Equitable Global Nuclear Order
The global nuclear order, characterized by the strategic dominance of nuclear-weapon states (NWS) and the hierarchical structure of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), has profound implications for African security and the broader international community. Africa, as a nuclear-weapon-free zone under the Treaty of Pelindaba (1996), has made significant contributions to non-proliferation and disarmament, exemplified by South Africa’s voluntary dismantling of its nuclear arsenal, the continent’s unified commitment to a nuclear-free Africa, and its advocacy for the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). However, the persistence of global nuclear arsenals, coupled with great power rivalries, proliferation risks, and environmental legacies, continues to challenge African security dynamics. Moving toward a secure and equitable global nuclear order requires addressing these challenges through enhanced African agency, global cooperation, and a reimagined approach to nuclear governance.
Africa’s role in the global nuclear order is both a moral and strategic necessity. The continent’s historical experience with colonialism, including the environmental and humanitarian toll of nuclear testing in Algeria, underscores its stake in advocating for a world free of nuclear weapons. The Treaty of Pelindaba and South Africa’s disarmament demonstrate Africa’s leadership in rejecting nuclear armament as a means of security, instead prioritizing regional stability and global disarmament. Yet, the continent’s limited representation in key decision-making bodies, such as the United Nations Security Council, and its economic dependence on external powers constrain its ability to fully shape the nuclear agenda.
Several imperatives must address the goal of a secure and equitable global nuclear order. First, nuclear-weapon states must fulfill their NPT commitments to disarmament under Article VI, reducing the global stockpile of approximately 12,000 nuclear warheads. African states, through coalitions like the New Agenda Coalition, can amplify pressure on NWS to honor these obligations, emphasizing the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons. Second, equitable access to peaceful nuclear technology is critical for African development. Countries like South Africa and Ghana, pursuing nuclear energy to address energy deficits, require support from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to balance non-proliferation safeguards with developmental needs.
Third, strengthened global and regional security frameworks must mitigate the risks of nuclear proliferation, particularly in regions proximate to Africa, such as the Middle East. African states can enhance nuclear security by investing in border controls, port security, and regional cooperation through the African Commission on Nuclear Energy (AFCONE) to prevent illicit trafficking of nuclear materials. Fourth, emerging technologies, including cyber warfare and artificial intelligence, introduce new risks to nuclear stability. African states, despite technological constraints, must engage in global dialogues to ensure these technologies do not undermine non-proliferation efforts.
Finally, addressing the environmental and humanitarian legacies of nuclear activities is essential for justice and equity. African states should continue to seek accountability for historical nuclear testing, such as France’s activities in Algeria, through international legal mechanisms and reparations frameworks. This effort also aligns with Africa’s broader push for a decolonized global order and prioritizes the interests of non-nuclear states.
The path to a secure and equitable global nuclear order lies in collective action. African states, leveraging their moral authority as a nuclear-weapon-free zone, can lead by example, advocating for disarmament, strengthening regional security, and promoting peaceful nuclear technology. Global cooperation, including partnerships with the IAEA, the United Nations, and non-aligned movements, must dismantle the hierarchical nuclear order and foster a world where security does not depend on the threat of mutual destruction. By sustaining its commitment to non-proliferation and disarmament, Africa can play a transformative role in building a safer, fairer, and more sustainable global nuclear future.
REFERENCES
African Union. (1996). Treaty of Pelindaba: African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty. Addis Ababa: African Union.
Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
Council on Foreign Relations. (2023). Great Power Competition in Africa: Implications for Global Security. New York: CFR.
Dee, M. (2017). “The New Agenda Coalition: Bridging the Divide in Nuclear Diplomacy.” Journal of Global Security Studies, 2(3), 223–239.
Hecht, G. (2012). Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
International Atomic Energy Agency. (2022). Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security: Annual Report. Vienna: IAEA.
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). (2023). TPNW Ratification Status. Geneva: ICAN.
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Kaplan, R. D. (2020). The Return of Marco Polo’s World: War, Strategy, and American Interests in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Random House.
Liberman, P. (2001). “The Rise and Fall of the South African Bomb.” International Security, 26(2), 45–86.
Marcum, J. A. (1990). The Angolan Revolution: Exile Politics and Guerrilla Warfare. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ogunbanwo, S. (1996). “The Treaty of Pelindaba: Africa’s Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone.” African Yearbook of International Law, 4, 155–172.
Pabian, F. V. (1995). “South Africa’s Nuclear Weapon Program: Lessons for Non-Proliferation.” Nonproliferation Review, 3(1), 1–19.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2023). SIPRI Yearbook 2023: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
United Nations. (1968). Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (2017). Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (2022). Report of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: Illicit Trafficking in Africa. New York: UNODC.
Waltz, K. N. (1981). “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better.” Adelphi Papers, 21(171), 1–32.
Zondi, S. (2018). “Africa and Global Governance: The Quest for Reform.” South African Journal of International Affairs, 25(4), 503–520.