Reforms in Multilateral Institutions and The Challenges of Maintaining a Rule-Based International Order Amid Geopolitical Shifts

 

1.      Introduction to Multilateral Institutions and the Rule-Based International Order

Multilateral Institutions

Multilateral institutions are international organizations or frameworks that involve multiple countries working together to address global issues, promote cooperation, and establish norms and rules for international behavior. Examples include the United Nations (UN), World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and regional organizations like the European Union (EU) or the African Union (AU). These institutions are founded on the principle of “multilateralism”, which emphasizes collective action, shared responsibilities, and adherence to agreed-upon rules to manage global challenges such as security, trade, human rights, and environmental issues. The key features of Multilateral Institutions included collective decision-making, norms and rules, global public goods, institutional structure, among others. An instance of this, is the United Nations established in 1945, which multilateralism served as its cornerstone, with its Charter emphasizing principles like sovereignty, peace, and human right. Correspondingly, the World Trade Organisation governs global trade rules, aiming to ensure fair and predictable economic interactions.

The Rule-Based International Order (RBIO)

The Rule-Based International Order (RBIO) refers to a system of international relations governed by a set of rules, norms, and institutions that promote stability, cooperation, and predictability in global affairs. It is often contrasted with a sovereignty-based order, where state power and unilateral actions dominate. The RBIO is rooted in the post-World War II era and is characterised by liberal principles such as multilateralism, free trade, human rights, and the rule of law.

Evolutions of RBIO

·         Post-1945 Origins: The RBIO emerged after World War II with the creation of institutions like the UN, IMF, and World Bank. These institutions aimed to prevent another global conflict, promote economic stability, and foster cooperation. The Bretton Woods system, for example, established rules for monetary and trade relations.

·         Liberal International Order: Initially termed the “Liberal international order,” the RBIO was based on democratic governance, economic openness, and human rights. It evolved from a sovereignty-based order to one emphasizing rules and norms, particularly between 1945 and the early 2000s.

·         Shifts to “Rules-Based” Terminology: The term "rules-based international order" gained prominence as a response to challenges in adapting the liberal order to a changing global environment. It reflects a broader, more flexible framework that includes both binding international law and non-binding norms.

The core components of the RBIO included International law, Multilateral Institutions, Norms and Values, and Soft Law. However, the RBIO is not a monolithic system. Some scholars argue that it comprises multiple subsystems, such as Universal Security System (USS), a Universal Economic System (UES), and a Western System, each reflecting different power dynamics and bargains.

The Role of Multilateral Institutions in the RBIO

Multilateral Institutions are the backbone of the RBIO, serving as platforms for creating, implementing, and enforcing rules. Their roles include:

·         Rule-Making: Institutions like the WTO establish rules for global trade, while the UN General Assembly and Security Council set norms for peace and security.

·         Conflict Resolution: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and other tribunals adjudicate disputes, reinforcing the rule of law.

·         Global Governance: Institutions address transnational issues like climate change, poverty, and pandemics. For example, India’s participation in the G20 and BRICS highlights the growing role of minilateral institutions in complementing traditional multilateralism.

·         Stabilising International Relations: Multilateral norms and institutions have helped managed global changes, such as the end of the Cold War, by providing frameworks for cooperation.

2.                  Key Reforms Needed in Multilateral Institutions

Governance and Representation

The governance structures of many multilateral institutions, such as the UN Security Council (UNSC) and the IMF, reflect post-World War II power dynamics, with disproportionate influence held by a few nations (e.g., the five permanent UNSC members: US, China, Russia, UK, France). Emerging economies and developing nations are underrepresented, undermining legitimacy and inclusivity.

Proposed Reforms

• Reform Voting Structures: Adjust voting rights in institutions like the IMF and World Bank to reflect current global economic realities. For example, increase the voting shares of emerging economies like Australia, India, and Brazil.
• Expand UNSC Membership: Include permanent seats for underrepresented regions (e.g., Africa, Latin America) and consider rotating seats for middle powers to balance influence.
• Transparent Leadership Selection: Replace opaque appointment processes (e.g., World Bank and IMF leadership traditionally led by the US and Europe) with merit-based, globally inclusive selection mechanisms.

Financial Architecture

The global financial system, managed by the IMF and World Bank, struggles to address the debt crises of low-income countries, provide adequate funding for climate initiatives, and respond to rapid economic shifts caused by technology and globalization.

Proposed Reforms

• Increase Funding Capacity: Expand Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) allocations to support developing nations without increasing debt burdens.
• Debt Relief Mechanisms: Establish structured debt restructuring frameworks to prevent prolonged debt crises, incorporating private creditors and multilateral coordination.
• Green Financing: Create dedicated funds for climate adaptation and mitigation, prioritizing grants over loans for vulnerable nations.

Accountability and Transparency

Many multilateral institutions lack sufficient accountability mechanisms, leading to criticisms of inefficiency, corruption, or bias toward powerful nations’ interests.

Proposed Reforms

• Independent Oversight Bodies: Establish independent audit and evaluation bodies to monitor operations and ensure compliance with mandates.
• Public Reporting: Mandate regular, detailed public disclosures of decision-making processes, funding allocations, and project outcomes.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Involve civil society, local communities, and non-state actors in policy design and implementation to enhance legitimacy.

Adaptability to Emerging Challenges

Multilateral institutions are often slow to respond to new global challenges, such as climate change, pandemics, cybersecurity, and digital economies, due to bureaucratic inertia and outdated mandates.

Proposed Reforms

• Climate-Focused Mandates: Integrate climate change as a core mandate across institutions, with binding commitments to support the Paris Agreement goals.
• Digital Governance Frameworks: Develop global standards for cybersecurity, data privacy, and AI governance through collaborative platforms like the UN or WTO.
• Crisis Response Mechanisms: Create rapid-response units for pandemics, humanitarian crises, and economic shocks, with pre-allocated resources and streamlined decision-making.

Equity and Inclusivity

Global inequalities, including economic, gender, and regional disparities, are inadequately addressed, perpetuating systemic imbalances in decision-making and resource allocation.

Proposed Reforms

• Inclusive Policy Frameworks: Prioritize policies that address gender equality, indigenous rights, and marginalized communities in all programs.
• Regional Representation: Establish regional hubs to decentralize operations and ensure local perspectives shape global policies.
• Capacity Building: Provide technical and financial support to developing nations to enhance their participation in multilateral negotiations.

Conflict Resolution and Peacekeeping

The UN’s peacekeeping and conflict resolution mechanisms are often ineffective due to political divisions, underfunding, and lack of enforcement power.

Proposed Reforms

• Strengthen Peacekeeping Mandates: Equip peacekeeping missions with robust mandates, adequate funding, and clear exit strategies.
• Mediation and Diplomacy: Enhance the UN’s mediation capacity by training specialized diplomatic teams to prevent conflicts proactively.
• Sanctions Reform: Reform sanctions regimes to minimize humanitarian impacts while targeting specific actors, with clear criteria and timelines.

Trade and Economic Cooperation

The WTO faces challenges in enforcing global trade rules, resolving disputes, and addressing modern trade issues like e-commerce and intellectual property in a polarized world.

Proposed Reforms

• Revive Dispute Settlement: Restore the WTO’s Appellate Body by resolving deadlocks over appointments and streamlining dispute resolution processes.
• Incorporate Digital Trade: Develop global trade agreements for digital goods, services, and data flows, balancing innovation with privacy and security.
• Support Small Economies: Provide preferential trade terms and technical assistance to small and developing economies to integrate into global markets.

Collaboration with Non-State Actors

Multilateral institutions often fail to leverage the expertise and influence of non-state actors, such as NGOs, private sectors, and academic institutions, limiting their effectiveness.

Proposed Reforms

• Public-Private Partnerships: Foster structured collaborations with private sectors to fund and implement development projects.
• NGO Integration: Create formal channels for NGOs to contribute to policy design and monitoring, particularly in humanitarian and environmental areas.
• Academic and Research Collaboration: Establish research partnerships to inform evidence-based policymaking and innovation.

3.      Geopolitical Shifts Impacting Multilateral Institutions

        The sporadic changes in International environment significantly influenced multilateral institutions, thereby reshaping their effectiveness, relevance, and ability to address global challenges. Recent geopolitical developments—such as renewed great power competition, the rise of multipolarity, economic nationalism, and regional conflicts—have strained the traditional frameworks of multilateralism established post-World War II (e.g., the United Nations, World Trade Organization, and World Health Organization). The shift from a unipolar world dominated by the United States to a multipolar one, with rising powers like China, India, and regional blocs like BRICS, has altered global power dynamics. Additionally, events like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, U.S.-China trade tensions, and the partial withdrawal of major powers from international frameworks (e.g., U.S. exit from the Paris Climate Agreement and WHO) have challenged the cohesion of multilateral institutions.

Key Impacts on Multilateral Institutions

·         Erosion of Trust and Cooperation

Multilateral institutions rely on trust and cooperation among member states. However, deepening distrust—driven by geopolitical rivalries, particularly between the U.S. and China—has weakened their efficacy. For instance, the U.S.-China trade war, marked by tariffs and technology transfer restrictions, has undermined the WTO’s ability to enforce global trade rules. Similarly, the UN Security Council’s paralysis on issues like Ukraine, due to vetoes by Russia and China, highlights how great power competition stifles collective action.

·         Rise of Multipolarity and Regionalism

The emergence of multipolarity, with middle powers like India, Brazil, and ASEAN gaining influence, has led to the rise of regional and alternative frameworks (e.g., RCEP, BRICS). These blocs often prioritize regional interests over global cooperation, fragmenting multilateral efforts. For instance, ASEAN’s trade intensity and integration in cross-border value chains contrast with declining U.S.-China trade, signaling a shift toward geopolitically aligned trade networks.

·         Impact of Economic Nationalism and Protectionism

The rise of economic nationalism—evident in U.S. tariffs, Brexit, and China’s self-reliance policies—has disrupted global trade and supply chains, challenging institutions like the WTO. Protectionist policies favor bilateral or regional agreements, which are quicker to negotiate but often exclude broader multilateral principles. For example, the U.S. shift toward “friend shoring” and trade with geopolitically closer partners like Mexico and Vietnam reduces reliance on global frameworks.

·         Weakening Global Health Governance

Geopolitical shifts have significantly impacted global health institutions like the WHO. The U.S. withdrawal from WHO funding during the Trump administration and reduced USAID support have led to setbacks in disease control and pandemic preparedness. For instance, the Stop TB Partnership estimated 11,000 additional tuberculosis deaths due to funding disruptions between January and March 2025. Similarly, WHO’s warnings about potential reversals in HIV progress highlight the cascading effects of geopolitical disengagement.

·         Institutional Deadlocks and Structural Challenges

Multilateral institutions face internal challenges, including outdated voting procedures, lack of enforcement mechanisms, and bureaucratic inefficiencies. These structural issues exacerbate deadlocks, as seen in the WTO’s stalled trade negotiations and the UN’s inability to address conflicts effectively. The rise of non-state actors, such as multinational corporations and NGOs, further complicates negotiations by introducing competing agendas.

4.      Challenges in Maintaining a Rule-Based International Order

The concept of a Rule-Based International Order (RBIO) refers to a global system where international relations are governed by agreed-upon rules, norms, and institutions rather than unilateral actions or power politics. It emphasizes principles like sovereignty, territorial integrity, human rights, and international law, often embodied in institutions like United Nations, World Trade Organisation, and international treaties. However, maintaining such an order faces significant challenges due to geopolitical, economic and social dynamics.

i.                    Geopolitical Rivalries and Power Shifts

The RBIO is challenged by competing visions of global governance, particularly as power dynamics shift among major states.

·         Great Power Competition: The resurgence of great power rivalry, particularly between the United States, China and Russia, undermines the RBIO. For instance, China’s assertive actions in the South China Sea, including island-building the territorial claims, challenge international maritime law under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Similarly, Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 violated norms of territorial integrity, exposing the limits of enforcement mechanisms like UN sanctions.

·         Declining U.S Hegemony: The U.S. has historically been a key architect and enforcer of the RBIO (e.g., through NATO, the Bretton Woods Institutions). However, its relative decline in influence, couple with occasional unilateral actions (e.g., the 2003 Iraq invasion without UN approval), has weakened its moral authority to champion the RBIO. Meanwhile, rising powers like China promote alternative frameworks, such as the Belt and Road Initiative, which may prioritise bilateral deals over multilateral rules.

·         Multipolarity and Fragmentation: The shift toward a multipolar world creates competing visions of order. For example, the BRICS coalition (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) advocates for reforms to institutions like the IMF to reflect new economic realities, but disagreements over governance models hinder consensus.

ii.                  Disruption of Multilateral Institutions

International Institutions, the backbone of the RBIO, face challenges in legitimacy, efficacy, and adaptability.

·         Institutional Paralysis: The UN Security Council, tasked with maintaining global peace, is often paralyzed by vetoes from permanent members (U.S., Russia, China, France, UK). For instance, Russia’s vetoes have blocked action on Syria, while the U.S. has shielded Israel from resolutions. This undermines the UN’s credibility as an impartial arbiter.

·         Outdated Structures: Many institutions, like the IMF and World Bank, reflect post-World War II power dynamics, underrepresenting emerging economies. For example, China’s voting share in the IMF (6.4% as of 2023) is disproportionate to its economic weight, fueling demands for reform that are slow to materialize.

·         Proliferation of Alternatives: Dissatisfaction with Western-dominated institutions has led to parallel frameworks, such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) led by China. While these can complement the RBIO, they also risk fragmenting global norms if they prioritise regional or ideological agendas.

iii.       Challenges to International Law and Norms

The RBIO depends on adherence to International Law, but compliance is uneven, and enforcement mechanisms are weak.

·         Selective Adherence: States often cherry-pick which rules to follow. For example, the U.S. has not ratified UNCLOS but expects others to abide by it. Similarly, China ratified UNCLOS but rejects its rulings, such as the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration decision against its South China Sea claims.

·         Weak Enforcement: International Law lacks a centralized enforcement mechanism. The International Criminal Court (ICC), for instance, has no jurisdiction over non-members like the U.S., China, or Russia, limiting its ability to hold powerful states accountable for war crimes or human rights abuses.

·         Emerging Domains: New domains like cyberspace and outer space challenge existing legal frameworks. For example, cyberattacks attributed to state actors (e.g., Russia’s alleged interference in U.S. elections_ lack clear international regulation, and the 1967 Outer Space Treaty struggles to address modern issues like space mining or militarization.

iv.     Economic and Technological Disruptions

·         Economic Interdependence and Nationalism: While globalisation fosters interdependence, economic nationalism (e.g., US-China trade wars, tariffs, and sanctions) undermines cooperative frameworks like the WTO’s dispute mechanism has been crippled since 2019 due to U.S. objections to appointing new judges.

·         Technological Competition: The race for dominance in AI, 5G, and quantum computing has led to fragmented standards. For example, China’s Huawei faces bans in Western countries over security concerns, while the U.S. pushes for a “clean network” initiative, risking a bifurcated global tech ecosystem that undermines universal standards.

·         Climate Change: Environmental challenges test the RBIO’s ability to foster collective action. The Paris Agreement (2015) is non-binding, and major emitters like China and India face pressure to balance development with emission cuts. Disparities in responsibility-developed and developing nations- complicate enforcement of climate norms.

v.   Domestic and Ideological Pressures

Internal political dynamics and ideological divides erode commitment to the RBIO

·         Rise of Populism and Nationalism: Populist movements in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere often reject globalism in favour of sovereignty. Brexit, for instance, reflected skepticism toward supranational institutions like the EU, which align with RBIO principles. Similarly, “America First” policies under Trump prioritized unilateralism over multilateral cooperation.

·         Authoritarian Pushback: Authoritarian regimes challenge liberal democratic norms embedded in the RBIO, such as human rights and freedom of expression. China’s censorship and surveillance model, exported through initiatives like the Digital Silk Road, contrasts with Western advocacy for an open internet, creating normative conflicts.

·         Polarization and trust Deficit: Domestic polarization in key states reduces political will to uphold international commitments. For example, U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement (2017-2020) and the Iran nuclear deal (2018) signaled a retreat from multilateralism, eroding trust among allies.

vi.                   Non-State Actors and Transnational Challenges

The RBIO is primarily state-centric, but non-actors and global issues complicate its maintenance.

·         Terrorism and Organised Crime: Non-state actors like terrorist groups (e.g., ISIS) or cartels exploit gaps in international governance. For instance, weak coordination or counterterrorism allows groups to operate across borders, as seen in the Sahel region.

·         Corporate Power: Multinational Corporations, particularly in tech (e.g., Google, Meta), wield influence that rival states, yet operate outside traditional RBIO frameworks. Their role in data privacy, misinformation, and AI ethics demands new regulatory approaches.

·         Global Health and Pandemics: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in global health governance. The World Health Organisation faced criticism for its slow response and perceived deference to China, while vaccine nationalism undermined equitable distribution through COVAX.

vii.              Regional Instability and Local Conflicts

Regional conflicts destabilize the RBIO by creating power vacuums and humanitarian crises.

·         Middle East and Proxy Wars: Conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and Libya involve external powers (e.g., Russia, Iran, Turkey) backing proxies, violating norms of non-interference. These wars strain institutions like the UN, which struggle to mediate or deliver aid.

·         Refugee and Migration Flows: Conflicts and Climate change drive migration, challenging state sovereignty and international cooperation. The 2015 European migrant crisis highlighted tensions between humanitarian obligations and national interests, with no clear RBIO mechanisms to resolve them.

5.      Conclusion: Pathways to Effective Reforms and a Resilient Global Order

The concept of a resilient global order hinges on the ability of international systems to adapt to emerging challenges while maintaining stability and promoting cooperation. The phrase "Pathways to Effective Reforms and a Resilient Global Order" suggests a focus on transformative processes that strengthen global governance, address systemic vulnerabilities, and foster equitable and sustainable international frameworks. This analysis explores the pathways to achieving such reforms, drawing on recent global trends, institutional dynamics, and policy frameworks. It examines the challenges, proposes actionable strategies, and considers the role of key stakeholders in building a resilient global order.

Understanding a Resilient Global Order

A resilient global order is characterized by institutions and frameworks that can withstand economic, political, environmental, and social shocks while promoting inclusivity, equity, and sustainability. It requires adaptive governance structures that respond to crises like climate change, geopolitical tensions, and technological disruptions. The need for reform arises from the recognition that existing global institutions, such as the United Nations, World Trade Organization, and International Monetary Fund, face challenges in addressing contemporary issues due to outdated structures, power imbalances, and lack of inclusivity.

Key elements of a resilient global order include:

• Adaptability: The ability to evolve in response to new challenges, such as pandemics or cyberattacks.
• Inclusivity: Ensuring representation of diverse nations, particularly those from the Global South, to address systemic biases.
• Sustainability: Aligning global policies with environmental and social sustainability goals.
• Cooperation: Fostering multilateral collaboration to tackle transnational issues like climate change and migration.

Challenges to Effective Reforms

Several obstacles impede the path to a resilient global order:

1. Geopolitical Tensions: Rising tensions among major powers, such as the U.S., China, and Russia, complicate multilateral cooperation. For instance, conflicts in regions like the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Lebanon highlight the difficulty of achieving consensus on human rights and security issues.
2. Institutional Inertia: Many global institutions were designed for a post-World War II world and struggle to address modern challenges like digital governance and climate change. The UN Human Rights Office, for example, faces funding constraints that limit its ability to update its operations.
3. Economic Disparities: The global financial system often favors powerful economies, marginalizing smaller nations. Post-2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) regulatory shifts, as seen in France’s FinTech sector, illustrate the challenge of balancing innovation with stability while ensuring equitable access.
4. Social Inequities: Issues like gender inequality and violence against women remain pervasive, undermining social cohesion and global stability.
5. Technological Disruptions: The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and other technologies poses challenges to governance, as seen in discussions around Indigenous sovereignty in the AI era.

Pathways to Effective Reforms

To address these challenges, several pathways can guide reforms toward a resilient global order:

1. Strengthening Multilateral Institutions

Reforming global institutions is critical to enhancing their legitimacy and effectiveness. This includes:

• Expanding Representation: Increasing the voice of developing nations in bodies like the UN Security Council and IMF to address geographical biases.
• Modernizing Mandates: Updating the mandates of institutions to include emerging issues like climate change and digital governance. For instance, the UN Human Rights Office’s focus on grassroots partnerships, such as empowering South Africa’s youth, demonstrates the value of localized engagement.
• Securing Funding: Addressing underfunding, as seen in the UN Human Rights Office, to ensure operational capacity.

2. Promoting Inclusive Economic Policies

Economic reforms should prioritize inclusivity and resilience:

• Supporting Innovation: The French FinTech case highlights how regulatory shifts post-GFC can foster innovation while maintaining stability. Encouraging similar approaches globally can support small and medium enterprises, particularly in developing economies.
• Reducing Inequalities: Policies that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) in corporate leadership can enhance economic resilience. McKinsey’s research shows that companies with diverse executive teams are 25% more likely to outperform financially, suggesting that inclusivity drives broader economic stability.
• Sustainable Finance: Aligning financial systems with environmental goals, such as through green bonds, can support a transition to a low-carbon economy.

3. Enhancing Human Rights and Social Equity

A resilient global order must prioritize human rights and social justice:

• Addressing Systemic Inequities: Initiatives like the UN’s Universal Periodic Review help track progress on human rights, but more robust enforcement mechanisms are needed.
• Empowering Marginalized Groups: Programs targeting women, Indigenous peoples, and youth, such as those highlighted by the UN, can build social resilience.
• Combating Violence: Addressing issues like violence against women, as noted in UN reports, is essential for social stability.

4. Leveraging Technology Responsibly

Technology offers opportunities and risks for global resilience:

• Ethical AI Governance: The UN’s focus on Indigenous sovereignty in the AI era underscores the need for inclusive technological frameworks.
• Energy Efficiency: The International Energy Agency’s 2024 report highlights the need to manage AI’s power consumption to ensure environmental sustainability.
• Cybersecurity: Addressing threats like malware propagation, as studied in network stability analyses, is crucial for digital resilience.

5. Fostering Global Cooperation

Collaboration across borders is essential for resilience:

• Climate Action: Multilateral agreements like the Paris Accord must be strengthened to address climate change effectively.
• Conflict Resolution: The UN’s calls for halting military actions in Gaza and addressing violence in Syria demonstrate the need for diplomatic solutions.
• Knowledge Sharing: Platforms like Wikipedia, despite biases, facilitate global knowledge dissemination, supporting informed policy-making.

Stakeholder Roles

Achieving these reforms requires coordinated action from multiple stakeholders:

• Governments: Must lead by example, implementing policies that align with global goals while addressing domestic needs.
• International Organizations: Should drive institutional reforms and facilitate cooperation.
• Private Sector: Can innovate responsibly, as seen in FinTech, and promote DE&I, as highlighted by McKinsey.
• Civil Society: Plays a critical role in advocating for human rights and holding institutions accountable.
• Individuals: Through grassroots efforts, individuals can drive change, as seen in South Africa’s youth empowerment initiatives.

Conclusion

Building a resilient global order requires addressing systemic challenges through inclusive, adaptive, and cooperative reforms. By strengthening multilateral institutions, promoting equitable economic policies, prioritizing human rights, leveraging technology responsibly, and fostering global cooperation, stakeholders can pave the way for a stable and sustainable future. The examples of post-GFC regulatory shifts, UN human rights initiatives, and DE&I-driven economic resilience underscore the potential for transformative change. However, success depends on overcoming geopolitical tensions, institutional inertia, and social inequities through collective action and innovative governance.

Citations

UN Human Rights Office. (2025). Publications and News.

Papiasse, D. (2025). The Interpretive Politics of FinTech Regulation in France. SpringerLink.

Wikipedia. (2025). Wikipedia Overview.

McKinsey & Company. (2020). Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters.

International Energy Agency. (2024). Electricity 2024, Analysis and Forecast to 2026.

https://www.gcsp.ch/sites/default/files/2024-12/Speech-TGreminger-2024-12%253BRedefining%2520Multilateralism%2520in%2520a%2520New%2520Geopolitical%2520Era.pdf

https://worldjurisprudence.com/challenges-to-multilateralism-in-trade/

https://juniperpublishers.com/jojph/JOJPH.MS.ID.555770.php

https://www.csis.org/analysis/four-scenarios-geopolitical-order-2025-2030-what-will-great-power-competition-look

https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/FP_20190918_competitive_multilateralism_FINAL.pdf

https://www.kas.de/en/web/newyork/un-agora-blog/detail/-/content/multilateralism-its-current-challenges-and-way-forward

https://www.eiu.com/n/global-outlook-rising-geopolitical-risks-in-2025-amid-tariff-shocks-and-policy-shifts/

RUSI. (n.d.). "Which Rules? Why There is No Single Rules-Based International System. https://static.rusi.org/201905_op_which_rules_why_there_is_no_single_rules_based_international_system_web.pdf

RAND Corporation. (n.d.). "China and the International Order." https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR2400/RR2423/RAND_RR2423.pdf

Dugard, J. (2023). "The choice before us: International law or a ‘rules-based international order’?" Leiden Journal of International Law, 36(2), 223-232. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/choice-before-us-international-law-or-a-rulesbased-international-order/7BEDE2312FDF9D6225E16988FD18BAF0

Sloss, D. L. (2022). "Introduction: Preserving a Rules-based International Order." *Is the International Legal Order Unraveling? * Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/44516/chapter/376540987

Vylegzhanin, A. N., et al. (2021). "The Term ‘Rules-based International Order’ in International Legal Discourses." *Moscow Journal of International Law*, 35-60. https://www.sciencegate.app/document/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-2-35-60

https://www.kas.de/en/web/newyork/un-agora-blog/detail/-/content/multilateralism-its-current-challenges-and-way-forward

Stability Analysis of Malware Propagation in Computer Networks. (2025). ScienceDirect.