.jpeg)
Introduction
Africa, long marginalized in global
affairs as a peripheral actor defined by poverty, conflict, and dependency, is
undergoing a profound transformation. By 2025, the continent—home to 1.4
billion people, vast untapped resources, and the world's youngest and
fastest-growing population—is no longer a passive recipient of external agendas
but an active shaper of international dynamics. This shift is driven by a
confluence of demographic dividends, economic integration efforts, and
intensified great-power competition, positioning Africa as a geopolitical
fulcrum in a multipolar world. As the African Union (AU) gains permanent
membership in the G20 and BRICS expands to include African nations, the
continent's agency is amplifying, challenging outdated narratives of victimhood
and enabling strategic recalibrations that prioritize self-reliance and mutual
partnerships.
Historical Context: From Colonial
Periphery to Post-Cold War Pawn
Africa's geopolitical narrative has
been one of external domination. The 19th-century "Scramble for
Africa" partitioned the continent among European powers, extracting
resources while imposing artificial borders that sowed seeds of enduring
conflict. Post-independence in the 1960s, the Cold War turned Africa into a
proxy battleground, with superpowers like the U.S. and Soviet Union backing
rival factions in proxy wars from Angola to Ethiopia. This era entrenched
neocolonial structures, including debt traps via institutions like the IMF and
World Bank, which often prioritized creditor interests over local development.
The post-Cold War unipolar moment
under U.S. hegemony offered fleeting hopes of partnership but devolved into
interventions framed as "democracy promotion"—Libya in 2011 being a
stark example, where regime change led to state collapse and resource chaos. By
the 2010s, China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) introduced a geo-economics
alternative, funding infrastructure without overt political strings, while
Russia's resurgence via military pacts in the Sahel challenged Western security
dominance. These shifts marked the end of Africa's marginalization, as its 54
nations—holding 30% of global mineral reserves—became indispensable in the
energy transition and tech supply chains.
Drivers of Africa’s Geopolitical
Ascendancy
Several
interconnected factors are propelling Africa's rise, transforming it from a
"continent of tomorrow" to a battleground of today's rivalries.
Demographic and Economic Dynamism
Africa's population is projected to
reach 2.5 billion by 2050, comprising 25% of the global total, with a median
age of 18—14 years younger than any other region. This "youth bulge"
fuels a burgeoning middle class (expected to hit 1.1 billion by 2060) and
drives economic growth, with sub-Saharan Africa hosting nine of the IMF's top 20
fastest-growing economies in 2024. The African Continental Free Trade Area
(AfCFTA), launched in 2021, connects 1.7 billion consumers with a $6.7 trillion
market, fostering intra-African trade and reducing external dependency. Digital
innovation amplifies this: Africa's fintech sector, valued at over $3 billion,
and projected digital economy contributions of $180 billion to GDP by 2025
underscore its tech frontier status.
Resource Leverage in a
Resource-Hungry World
Africa controls over 70% of global
cobalt (essential for EV batteries) and vast reserves of lithium, copper, and
rare earths, making it pivotal in the net-zero transition and AI boom. The
U.S.-China rivalry has intensified this: Washington's Inflation Reduction Act
and EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism demand secure supply chains, while
Beijing's BRI secures mining concessions. African leaders are leveraging this
for better terms, as seen in Zambia's 2025 renegotiation of Chinese copper
deals.
Institutional Empowerment
The AU's 2023 G20 membership and
BRICS expansion (welcoming Egypt and Ethiopia in 2024) institutionalize
Africa's voice, enabling unified stances on climate finance and UN reform.
South Africa's 2025 G20 presidency, the first by an African nation, exemplifies
this, pushing agendas on wealth inequality and Global South solidarity.
Great-Power Competition: Africa’s New
Multipolar Chessboard
In
the emerging multipolar order, Africa is the arena where U.S.-China-Russia
dynamics collide, with middle powers like Turkey, India, UAE, and Brazil vying
for influence.
|
Power |
Key
Engagements in Africa |
Strategic
Goals |
African
Responses |
|
United States |
AFRICOM bases; AGOA trade
preferences; $55B Prosper Africa initiative (2022-2025) |
Counterterrorism; Diversify
minerals from China; Promote democracy |
Mixed: Partnerships in
Kenya/Ethiopia, but coups in Sahel highlight waning leverage |
|
China |
BRI projects ($300B+ invested);
FOCAC summits; 2025 Changsha Declaration with 53 African states |
Secure resources; Infrastructure
for market access; Multipolar governance |
Enthusiastic: Debt-for-equity
swaps; Joint resistance to U.S. "protectionism" |
|
Russia |
Wagner/Africa Corps in
Mali/Burkina Faso; Arms deals; 2023 Russia-Africa Summit |
Military pacts; Anti-Western
narrative; Grain/food security |
Sahel juntas pivot: ECOWAS exit
(Jan 2025); Russian flags in Bamako |
|
EU/France |
Global Gateway ($300B
infrastructure); CFA franc influence |
Energy security; Migration
control; Retain Francophone sway |
Pushback: Senegal's 2025 foreign
base expulsion; Diversification to BRICS |
|
Emerging (India/Turkey/UAE) |
India's $100B trade pledge;
Turkey's Libya/Somalia bases; UAE's Sudan ports |
Soft power via tech/agri; Military
footholds; Sub-imperial resource grabs |
Selective: Nigeria-India vaccines;
UAE in Horn deals |
This
‘new scramble’ risks proxy conflicts, as seen in the Horn of Africa
(Ethiopia-Somaliland MoU sparking UAE-Egypt tensions) and Sahel coups. Yet, it
empowers African non-alignment: Leaders like Burkina Faso’s Ibrahim Traoré
invoke sovereignty, rejecting ‘neocolonial’ aid.
Opportunities for Africa in
Sino-American Competition
The Sino-American competition, often
framed as a "new Cold War" in economic, technological, and
geopolitical spheres, has positioned Africa as a pivotal arena. Recently, this
rivalry manifests in intensified investments, infrastructure projects, and
diplomatic overtures from both Beijing and Washington, driven by Africa's
abundant natural resources, youthful population (projected to reach 2.5 billion
by 2050), and growing markets. For African nations, this dynamic presents a
"win-win" scenario, allowing them to leverage competing interests for
development gains rather than being passive bystanders. However, realizing
these opportunities requires strategic agency to avoid debt traps, resource
exploitation, and geopolitical entanglements. This subtopic explores key
opportunities across sectors, drawing on recent developments under the second
Trump administration, which has emphasized "dealmaking" in critical
minerals and trade.
Economic Opportunities
Africa's integration into global
value chains stands to benefit immensely from the rivalry, as both powers vie
for market access and supply chain diversification. China's trade volume with
Africa surpasses the U.S. by a factor of four, reaching over $300 billion
annually by 2024, while U.S. initiatives like the African Growth and
Opportunity Act (AGOA) have evolved into tools for surplus-generating
partnerships. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), launched in 2021,
amplifies this by creating the world's largest free trade zone, enabling
intra-African trade to potentially triple by 2030 and reducing external
dependency.
|
Opportunity |
Sino-American
Dynamic |
African
Benefits |
Examples
(2024-2025) |
|
Trade Diversification |
U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods
(e.g., 60% on EVs in 2025) reroute Chinese exports to Africa, flooding
markets with affordable tech but spurring local manufacturing. China counters
with zero-tariff access for 98% of African exports under FOCAC 2024. |
Surge in exports (e.g., African
agricultural goods to China amid U.S. decoupling); AfCFTA integration boosts
regional value chains. |
Nigeria's $50 billion mineral
exports to China; U.S.-Africa trade surplus hits $11.24 billion. |
|
Infrastructure Financing |
Blended models emerge: U.S.
Development Finance Corporation (DFC) partners with African Finance
Corporation for $500 million Lobito Corridor rail (Angola-Zambia-DRC),
competing with China's $28 billion BRI peak (now stabilizing at $2 billion
post-COVID). |
Hybrid loans reduce debt burdens;
open tenders foster competition. |
China's Tanzania-Burundi railway
for nickel transport; U.S. $4.7 billion Mozambique gas loan. |
|
SME and Private Sector Growth |
U.S. focuses on small/medium
enterprises (SMEs) via USAID hubs, contrasting China's state-led model that
overlooks SMEs. |
Technology transfers and
low-interest loans empower 90% of African jobs in SMEs. |
U.S.-Senegal $20 million
youth/women SME fund; Chinese e-commerce models inspire African startups. |
These
dynamics could add $450 billion to Africa’s GDP by 2035 if leveraged via
AfCFTA, but require transparent procurement to mitigate ‘cheap import surges’
threatening local industries.
Infrastructure and Energy
Opportunities
China's historical dominance in
"checkbook diplomacy" (e.g., $290 million green loans in 2023 for
solar/hydropower) is now challenged by U.S. "Power Africa" expansions
and EU synergies, creating bidding wars that lower costs and improve standards.
Africa's energy deficit (600 million without electricity) offers a $100 billion
annual investment gap that rivalry can fill.
Renewable Energy Leapfrogging: U.S.-China
competition in green tech allows Africa to demand integrated packages (e.g.,
mining + grid upgrades). In 2025, China's Hunan-Niger pilot zone and U.S.
Lobito project exemplify this, transporting 3 million tons of minerals yearly
while electrifying industrial parks.
Digital Infrastructure: Huawei's
low-cost 5G networks face U.S. alternatives like Kenya's stalled $1 billion
data center, but rivalry spurs hybrid models for digital sovereignty. Events
like Senegal's Deep Learning Indaba highlight Africa's push for ethical AI
tailored to local languages.
Opportunities
here could universalize electrification by 2030, but demand ‘no-strings’
evolution toward blended finance to avoid opacity.
Technology and Innovation
Opportunities
The U.S.-China AI and tech race
positions African as a ‘neutral testing ground,’ with both powers investing in
data centers and skills transfer. Africa’s 1.4 billion population offers a
consumer base for AI-driven agriculture and health, projected to add $1.2
trillion to GDP by 2030.
AI and Digital Sovereignty: Navigating
rivalry allows "strategic hedging"—e.g., Senegal's 2023 AI strategy
leverages Chinese hardware and U.S. software for governance tools like
e-health. Funding gaps (Africa receives <1% of global VC) are bridged by
competition, with open-source tools enabling resilience.
E-Commerce and Fintech: Chinese
models (e.g., cross-border platforms) meet U.S. standards-based hubs, fostering
startups in Nigeria and Kenya.
This
sector could create 10 million jobs, but requires governance frameworks to
prevent data monopolies.
Geopolitical and Security
Opportunities
Africa's non-alignment (e.g., 51% of
citizen’s favor self-determination over democracy promotion) enhances
bargaining power. The rivalry discourages zero-sum cooperation between powers,
preserving African flexibility.
Diplomatic Leverage: FOCAC
2024's $60 billion pledges compete with U.S. summits, yielding debt relief
(e.g., China's 2025 G20 extensions). Sahel states renegotiate contracts amid
U.S./Chinese arms flows.
Peace and Security: Triangular
cooperation in UN missions (e.g., Somalia) builds capacity without basing
rights concessions. PLA patrols in the Gulf of Guinea offer training exchanges.
3. Challenges
of Navigating the Sino-American Rivalry
The Sino-American rivalry, often
described as a "new Cold War" or strategic competition, has evolved
from economic tensions in the early 2010s to a multifaceted contest
encompassing trade, technology, military influence, and geopolitical
positioning. As of October 2025, this rivalry remains the defining feature of
global politics, with U.S.-China relations marked by high-level dialogues
(e.g., the November 2024 APEC summit between Xi Jinping and Joe Biden) aimed at
stabilizing ties amid escalating concerns over trade tariffs, Taiwan, and the
South China Sea. For third countries—nations outside the direct U.S.-China
dyad—navigating this rivalry poses profound challenges. These include economic
coercion, forced alignment in global institutions, and risks to sovereignty,
all while global issues like climate change and pandemics demand cooperation
that the rivalry undermines. This analysis comprehensively examines these
challenges, drawing on recent scholarly, policy, and media sources. It begins
with general hurdles for third countries, then focuses on Africa as a case
study, exploring both the pitfalls and untapped potential amid the rivalry. The
goal is to highlight how third actors can leverage agency to mitigate risks and
pursue autonomous development.
General Challenges for Third
Countries in Navigating the Sino-American Rivalry
Third countries—spanning Europe,
Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa—face a "Thucydides Trap"
dynamic where rising (China) and established (U.S.) powers compete for
influence, compelling others to hedge, balance, or bandwagon. This creates a zero-sum
environment that erodes multilateralism and amplifies domestic pressures. Key
challenges include:
·
Economic
Pressures and Decoupling Risks: U.S. policies like
"de-risking" (e.g., export controls on semiconductors) and China's
Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) force third countries into bifurcated supply
chains. For instance, Southeast Asian nations like Vietnam and Malaysia benefit
from U.S.-China "friendshoring" but risk retaliation—China's 2019
rare earth export threats to Japan exemplify this coercion. In 2024, global
trade fragmentation cost third economies up to 7% of GDP growth, per IMF
estimates, as countries navigate tariffs and investment restrictions.
·
Security
and Alignment Dilemmas: The rivalry heightens military
tensions, pressuring allies and neutrals. U.S. alliances like AUKUS and the
Quad demand Indo-Pacific commitments, while China's "no-limits"
partnership with Russia (post-2022 Ukraine invasion) pulls others toward
multipolarity. South Korea, for example, balances U.S. security ties with $250
billion in annual China trade, but 2025 projections under a potential Trump
retrenchment could force deeper U.S. alignment, straining Beijing relations.
Neutral states like Indonesia face "existential" choices, fearing
escalation in the South China Sea.
·
Technological
and Normative Fragmentation: Competition over AI, 5G,
and biosecurity divides global standards. Huawei's dominance in African
telecoms (40% market share) clashes with U.S. bans, leaving third countries
with incompatible infrastructure. Europe's "triptych"
approach—cooperation, competition, rivalry—illustrates the strain: EU-China
trade hit €800 billion in 2024, yet U.S. pressure for tech decoupling risks
isolating Brussels.
·
Erosion
of Global Governance: Rivalry weakens institutions like the
UN and WTO. China's bloc-building (e.g., with 50+ Global South neutrals) and
U.S. "America First" isolationism reduce space for third-country
agendas on climate or debt relief. A 2025 CSIS report notes diminished
U.S.-China coordination on pandemics, leaving third states vulnerable to future
crises.
|
Challenge
Category |
Examples
for Third Countries |
Key
Impacts |
|
Economic |
Supply chain bifurcation (e.g., EV
production in Malaysia) |
GDP losses; investment volatility |
|
Security |
Alliance pressures (e.g., South
Korea's U.S.-Japan trilateral) |
Heightened regional tensions;
miscalculation risks |
|
Technological |
5G/ AI standards divide (e.g.,
EU's China strategy) |
Infrastructure incompatibilities;
innovation gaps |
|
Governance |
Weakened multilaterals (e.g., WTO disputes) |
Stalled progress on climate/debt |
These challenges are not inevitable;
game theory models suggest neutrals could form a "third way" bloc for
collective leverage, though heterogeneity (e.g., 50+ diverse Global South
states) hinders this.
Africa’s Unique Position in the
Sino-American Rivalry
Africa, with 54 nations and 1.4
billion people, exemplifies third-country navigation challenges while offering
distinct potential. Home to 30% of global critical minerals (e.g., cobalt,
lithium), the continent is a geo-economics battleground. China's
engagement—$21.7 billion BRI investments in 2023—dwarfs U.S. levels, but
Washington's 2022 Africa Strategy frames Beijing as undermining
"rules-based order." Recent events, like the U.S. rejecting a Chinese-linked
partner for Kenya's $4.7 billion Mombasa-Nairobi expressway in August 2025,
underscore the crossfire.
Challenges for Africa
·
Debt
Traps and Unequal Bargains: China's $170 billion
lending (2013-2023) funds infrastructure but burdens 20+ African states with unsustainable
debt, enabling asset concessions (e.g., Sri Lanka parallels in Zambia's copper
mines). U.S. alternatives like Prosper Africa emphasize transparency but attach
governance conditions, alienating authoritarian regimes. In 2024, mineral deals
in DRC ($1 billion copper) favored Chinese firms, exporting raw materials with
minimal local processing.
·
Resource
Competition and Neo-Colonialism: The scramble for minerals
pits U.S. (Mineral Security Partnership) against China's processing dominance
(80% of global cobalt refining). Political instability in mineral-rich states
(e.g., Mali, Zimbabwe) amplifies corruption risks, with Chinese firms gaining
edges via local ties. U.S. investments lag due to regulatory hurdles, leaving
Africa as a "resource periphery."
·
Geopolitical
Alignment Pressures: UNGA voting shows 40+ African states
aligning more with China (e.g., on Xinjiang), driven by non-interference
appeals, eroding U.S. soft power. Security rivalries emerge: U.S. AFRICOM vs.
China's Djibouti base, with Somaliland offering Washington a counter-base in
2025. Rivalry diverts from African priorities like climate adaptation, where
U.S.-China discord hampers funding.
·
Domestic
and Reputational Risks: Chinese projects often bypass
labor/environmental standards, fueling anti-China sentiment (e.g., 2024
Nigerian protests). U.S. focus on countering Beijing (e.g., inviting Equatorial
Guinea's dictator to 2022 summit) compromises democracy promotion.
Potential for Africa: Opportunities Amid
Rivalry
Despite
challenges, the rivalry creates "policy space" for Africa to hedge
and extract gains, as seen in Cold War-era autonomy. Africa's youthful
demographic (60% under 25) and AfCFTA (intra-continental trade up 20% in 2024)
position it for leverage.
Bargaining Power in Resources: Competition
bids up mineral deals—e.g., U.S. $2 billion Botswana copper mine vs. China's
$7.9 billion regional investments—enabling value-added processing (e.g.,
Namibia's lithium hubs). By 2050, clean energy demand could multiply
cobalt/lithium output 500%, with Africa capturing 20-30% more revenue via
neutral auctions.
Diversifies Partnerships and
Infrastructure: U.S.-China "checks and balances"
allow auctions for projects like Kenya's expressway, rejecting exploitative
terms. Japan's 2025 push for African ties (e.g., tech skills programs) adds
options, countering binary choices.
Agency in Global Forums: As
a UNGA swing bloc, Africa influences outcomes—e.g., abstaining on Ukraine to
prioritize debt relief. Neutrality, as urged in recent analyses, maximizes FDI
without entanglement. Multilaterals like the Mineral Security Partnership offer
ESG standards without U.S. dominance.
Cooperation Opportunities: Shared
interests in health/agriculture enable U.S.-China alignment via neutrals (e.g.,
Gavi vaccine model). Africa's "proactive diplomacy" (e.g., 2025
Mauritius summit) fosters trilateral deals on green energy.
|
Opportunity |
U.S.
Angle |
China
Angle |
African
Benefit |
|
Minerals |
MSP partnerships |
BRI processing |
Higher royalties, local jobs |
|
Infrastructure |
Prosper Africa transparency |
Loan-for-resource swaps |
Negotiated terms, tech transfer |
|
Diplomacy |
Democracy aid |
Non-interference |
Swing-vote leverage |
|
Cooperation |
Health/tech initiatives |
Agricultural aid |
Pandemic/climate resilience |
4. Conclusion:
Charting a Balanced Path Forward
In an era defined by intensifying
geopolitical contestation, Africa's position within the Sino-American rivalry
emerges not as a mere peripheral theater but as a pivotal arena where the
contours of a multipolar world order are being redrawn. As the United States
and China vie for influence across economic, political, and security domains,
the continent—endowed with abundant natural resources, a burgeoning youthful
population, and strategic geopolitical significance—stands at a crossroads. This
rivalry, while fraught with risks of fragmentation and proxy entanglements
reminiscent of Cold War proxy conflicts, also harbors transformative potential
if navigated with agency and pragmatism. Drawing on recent scholarly analyses,
this conclusion synthesizes the imperatives for African states to pursue a
balanced, Africa-centric path forward, one that leverages competition for
endogenous development while mitigating its destabilizing externalities.
The Sino-American engagement in
Africa has evolved from complementary economic footprints to a more overt
strategic overlay, with China dominating infrastructure and trade
investments—evidenced by its status as the continent's largest bilateral
trading partner and financier of landmark projects under the Belt and Road
Initiative—while the United States prioritizes security partnerships,
governance reforms, and capacity-building initiatives. This asymmetry has
fueled narratives of zero-sum competition, yet empirical evidence underscores
Africa's capacity for strategic hedging. Unlike the binary alignments of the
Cold War, contemporary African foreign policies exhibit a nuanced
non-alignment, as articulated in the African Union's Agenda 2063, which
emphasizes self-reliance and diversified partnerships. Scholarly assessments
reveal that African nations have increasingly aligned diplomatically with China
in forums like the United Nations—evidenced by near-unanimous support for
Beijing on issues such as Taiwan and human rights resolutions—while
pragmatically engaging Washington for military training and anti-terrorism
cooperation. This dual engagement, far from passive acquiescence, reflects
deliberate agency: African leaders exploit the rivalry to extract concessions,
such as concessional loans from China and technical assistance from the U.S.,
thereby enhancing bargaining leverage in a multipolar landscape.
Central to charting a balanced path
is the imperative of neutrality and multilateralism, principles enshrined in
post-colonial African diplomacy since the 1963 founding of the Organization of
African Unity (now the African Union). By resisting zero-sum pressures—such as
U.S. entreaties to exclude Huawei from telecommunications infrastructure or
Chinese overtures for exclusive resource access—African states can foster
"cooperation in competition," as posited in analyses of great-power
dynamics on the continent. This approach necessitates robust regional
integration through institutions like the African Continental Free Trade Area
(AfCFTA), which, by harmonizing tariffs and standards across 54 nations,
diminishes vulnerabilities to bilateral coercion and amplifies Africa's
collective voice in global negotiations. Moreover, prioritizing Africa-centric
development agendas—focusing on industrialization, digital inclusion, and green
energy transitions—transforms rivalry into a catalyst for innovation. For
instance, U.S.-China competition in critical minerals supply chains could
incentivize joint ventures in sustainable mining, provided African governments
enforce transparent contracts and local content requirements to avert resource
curses.
Yet, this path forward is not
without perils. Uncoordinated rivalry risks exacerbating debt vulnerabilities,
with Chinese lending—totaling over $150 billion since 2000—intersecting U.S.
aid flows in ways that strain fiscal capacities without commensurate
capacity-building. It may also entrench authoritarian tendencies if great
powers overlook governance deficits in pursuit of alliances, as seen in the
Sahel's recent coups where both Beijing and Washington have pragmatically
accommodated military regimes. To counter these, African policymakers must
invest in domestic resilience: bolstering anti-corruption frameworks,
diversifying export bases beyond raw commodities, and cultivating South-South
alliances with actors like India and the European Union to dilute Sino-American
dominance. Simultaneously, encouraging trilateral dialogues—such as
U.S.-China-Africa forums on climate adaptation—could yield positive
externalities, channeling competitive energies into shared goods like pandemic
preparedness and peacekeeping.
Sources
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/07/why-africa-will-become-a-prominent-player-in-global-geopolitics/
https://theinternationalriskpodcast.com/the-new-scramble-for-africa-shifting-global-dynamics-in-2025-author-elisa-garbil/
https://www.csis.org/analysis/vying-regional-leadership-horn-africa
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/08/20/geopolitics-vs-development-g20-africa-pushes-a-new-vision-for-the-global-south/
https://panafricanvisions.com/2025/04/africas-rising-global-influence/
https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/04/30/geopolitics-and-governance-in-north-africa-local-challenges-global-implications-pub-89502
https://www.afrobarometer.org/publication/u-s-china-competition-is-a-win-win-in-the-eyes-of-ordinary-africans/
https://www.semafor.com/article/09/22/2025/kenya-us-china-tech-war-ai-data-center
https://africacenter.org/spotlight/africa-china-relations-2025/
https://futures.issafrica.org/blog/2025/The-US-China-trade-war-and-Africas-manufacturing-crossroads
https://ascir.org/2025/02/18/navigating-the-u-s-china-ai-competition-an-african-perspective/
https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-and-smes-sub-saharan-africa-window-opportunity-united-states
https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/11/03/2025/america-first-africa-how-and-why-badmouthing-china-africa-did-not-profit-us-under
https://asiatimes.com/2025/03/africa-responds-to-trump-2-0-era-new-opportunities-from-china/
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/us-china-engagement-in-africa-a-crossroads/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2025.2514550?af=R
https://insights.aib.world/article/130834-caught-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place-africa-s-position-in-the-us-china-strategic-rivalry
https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/southeast-asia-s-response-to-the-us-china-rivalry
https://asiasociety.org/node/39388
https://x.com/BD_Africa/status/1956642095349002439?referrer=grok-com
https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/shattered-hegemony-the-rivalry-between-the-us-and-china-in-the-new-era-of-the-politics-of-force/
https://www.stimson.org/2025/competing-for-africas-resources-how-the-us-and-china-invest-in-critical-minerals/
https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/07/china-under-siege/key-issues-china-us-relationship
https://www.usip.org/publications/2021/04/sidestepping-great-power-rivalry-us-china-competition-africa
https://www.newsweek.com/2025/08/22/how-us-china-are-fighting-africas-vital-resources-2108635.html