The Progressive Era in US and Social Reform Movement

 



INTRODUCTION

The Progressive Era (1901–1929) was a period in the United States during the early 20th century of widespread social activism and political reform across the country. Progressives sought to address the problems caused by rapid industrialization, urbanization, immigration, and political corruption as well as the enormous concentration of industrial ownership in monopolies. Progressive reformers were alarmed by the spread of slums, poverty, and the exploitation of labor. Multiple overlapping progressive movements fought perceived social, political, and economic ills by advancing democracy, scientific methods, and professionalism; regulating business; protecting the natural environment; and improving working and living conditions of the urban poor.

Philosophical questions:

Why was it called the Progressive Era?

It was called Progressive movement because there was political and social-reform movement that brought major changes to the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this time, known as the Progressive Era, the movement’s goals involved strengthening the national government and addressing people’s economic, social, and political demands.

What were the causes of the Progressive Era?

·         The urbanization of the time included a shift from small-scale manufacturing and business to large-scale factory production.

·         The growth of cities and industries introduced new problems, such as worsening economic inequality, dangerous working conditions, and poor, overcrowded living conditions.

·         At the time, the United States had a more decentralized form of government that was not equipped to address new economic and social problems on a national scale.

What were the success of the Progressive Era?

·         The Progressive Era started a reform tradition that has since been present in American society.

·         Regulations that progressive groups helped to enact still shape government and commerce today, including food safety requirements, child labor laws, and the normalization of the eight-hour workday.

·         Many labor unions, trade groups, and professional, civic, and religious associations were founded. They improved the lives of individuals and communities.

What were the problems in the Progressive Era?

·         Rapid industrialization problem

·         Urbanization problem

·         Political corruption problem

Significant event in the Era

·         Spanish-American War

Spanish-American War, (1898), conflict between the United States and Spain that ended Spanish colonial rule in the Americas and resulted in U.S. acquisition of territories in the western Pacific and Latin America. The immediate cause of the Spanish-American War was Cuba's struggle for independence from Spain. Newspapers in the U.S. printed sensationalized accounts of Spanish atrocities, fueling humanitarian concerns. The mysterious destruction of the U.S. battleship Maine in Havana’s harbor on February 15, 1898, led to a declaration of war against Spain two months later.

·         Philippine-American War

There were two phases to the Philippine-American War. The first phase, from February to November of 1899, was dominated by Aguinaldo’s ill-fated attempts to fight a conventional war against the better-trained and equipped American troops. The second phase was marked by the Filipinos’ shift to guerrilla-style warfare. It began in November of 1899, lasted through the capture of Aguinaldo in 1901 and into the spring of 1902, by which time most organized Filipino resistance had dissipated. President Theodore Roosevelt proclaimed a general amnesty and declared the conflict over on July 4, 1902, although minor uprisings and insurrections against American rule periodically occurred in the years that followed.

Event that usher in the Progressive Era in USA

Propelled by a Second Industrial Revolution, the United States arose from the ashes of the Civil War to become one of the world’s leading economic powers by the turn of the 20th century. Corporate titans such as Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan amassed spectacular fortunes and engaged in the most conspicuous of consumptions. Beneath this golden veneer, however, American society was tarnished by poverty and corruption, which caused this period of American history to be called the “Gilded Age,” derived from the title of an 1873 novel co-authored by Mark Twain.

Protected from foreign competition by high tariffs, American industrialists colluded to drive competitors out of business by creating monopolies and trusts in which groups of companies were controlled by single corporate boards. Political corruption ran amok during the Gilded Age as corporations bribed politicians to ensure government policies favored big businesses over workers. Graft fueled urban political machines, such as New York’s Tammany Hall, and the Whiskey Ring and Crédit Mobilier scandals revealed collusion by public officials and business leaders to defraud the federal government.

As the rich grew richer during the Gilded Age, the poor grew poorer. The great wealth accumulated by the “robber barons” came at the expense of the masses. By 1890, the wealthiest 1 percent of American families owned 51 percent of the country’s real and personal property, while the 44 percent at the bottom owned only 1.2 percent.

The Populist Party pushes for reforms

Many Gilded Age workers toiled in dangerous jobs for low pay. Approximately 40 percent of industrial laborers in the 1880s earned below the poverty line of $500 a year. With such a yawning chasm between “haves” and “have-nots,” workers fought back against the inequality by forming labor unions. Industrial strikes occurred with greater frequency—and greater violence—following the Great Railroad Strike of 1877. During the 1880s alone, there were nearly 10,000 labor strikes and lockouts.

The belief that big businesses had too much power in the United States led to a backlash. The passage of the Tariff Act of 1890, which hiked import duties to nearly 50 percent and raised consumer prices, sparked an agrarian political rebellion that gave rise to the People’s Party, known as the “Populists.” The party advocated for government ownership of railroad and telephone companies, a graduated income tax, shorter workdays and the direct election of senators. In the 1892 presidential election, Populist candidate James Weaver won 22 electoral votes.

When the Panic of 1893 launched what was at the time the worst economic downturn in American history, President Grover Cleveland was forced to borrow $65 million in gold from financiers including Morgan to keep the federal government afloat, further highlighting corporate power in American society. 

“It is no longer a government of the people, by the people and for the people,” proclaimed Populist leader Mary Elizabeth Lease, “but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street and for Wall Street.” The victory of Tariff Act of 1890 sponsor William McKinley in the 1896 presidential election marked the effective end of the People’s Party, but it foreshadowed the Progressive Era to come.

The role of President Theodore Roosevelt in the Progressive Era

Some historians point to the 1890s as the start of the Progressive Era, but the ascent of Theodore Roosevelt to the presidency after McKinley’s assassination marked its definitive arrival. Like the Populists, Progressives advocated democratic reforms and greater governmental regulation of the economy to temper the capitalistic excesses of the Gilded Age. Historian Richard Hofstadter wrote that the Progressive movement sought to “restore a type of economic individualism and political democracy that was widely believed to have existed earlier in America and to have been destroyed by the great corporation and the corrupt political machine.”

Unlike previous presidents, Roosevelt vigorously enforced the Sherman Antitrust Act to break up industrial behemoths. The “trust buster” was also the first president to threaten to use the army on behalf of labor in a 1902 coal miners’ strike. Roosevelt easily won re-election in 1904 campaigning on a “Square Deal” platform to control corporations, conserve natural resources and protect consumers.

Investigative journalists, writers and photographers spurred Progressive reforms by exposing corporate malfeasance and social injustice. These “muckrakers” included Ida Tarbell, whose investigation of Rockefeller led to the breakup of the Standard Oil Company monopoly. Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle about working conditions in the meatpacking industry sparked the passage of the Meat Inspection Act and Pure Food and Drug Act in 1906.

SOCIAL REFORMS MOVEMENT

Settlement House Movement - White, upper-middle class, college-educated women who wanted to make a difference in society created and worked at settlement houses, which were like community centers in inner-city, immigrant neighborhoods. They wanted to improve the lives of slum-dwellers by providing education and child care, teaching English and other basic skills, helping the immigrants get better jobs and housing, and uplifting them culturally (art & music appreciation.) Part of the mission of the settlement house workers was Americanization of immigrants to teach the immigrants WASP middle-class values. The most famous settlement house was Hull House in Chicago, led by Jane Addams. Black middle-class women ran separate settlement houses for fellow African-Americans illustrating the racial segregation of the Progressive movement.

Housing and Sanitation Reforms - Progressive reformers urged cities to pass legislation which set standards for housing (to try to eliminate the worst tenements) and such sanitation matters as garbage pick-up and sewage systems. The legislation would require the hiring of inspectors to see that these standards were met. Many of the inspectors first hired by city governments under these reforms were women, such as Jane Addams.

Beautification Campaigns - Some reformers wanted to improve the urban environment by making it more pleasant and attractive. This, like the housing reforms, was based on their idea that an improved environment meant improved people. (This idea was a rejection of Social Darwinism.) Some of their reforms included parks, civic centers, and better transportation systems. Some historians argue that these were superficial reforms enacted to please the middle-class inhabitants or tourists of cities, but did not really address the dire problems of the masses who lived in the slums.

Anti-Prostitution Campaign - Progressives were responsible for the Mann Act (1910), which prohibited interstate transportation of women for immoral purposes. By 1915, nearly every state had outlawed prostitution.

Woman suffrage This was the movement to secure for women the right to vote. Many different kinds of women (race, class, and ethnicity) joined the campaign to win the federal amendment, but the movement was mainly led by WASP middle and upper-class women.

Factory Safety Regulations, Limits on Working Hours (mainly for women), Workers Compensation for injuries, Restrictions on Women and Child Labor - While labor unions sought these measures by organizing workers to bargain with their employers, a tense alliance between some middle-class and working-class reformers also sought these reforms by passing laws (government intervention instead of collective bargaining.) These reformers were successful in convincing most states to pass factory inspection laws, workers comp, and minimum age of employment laws. Some states passed laws limiting the number of hours’ women (but not men) could work. These regulations were usually difficult to enforce; many employers found ways to evade them.

Another problem was that some working-class families wanted their women and children to work in order to make as much money for the family as possible (in order to survive) and did not appreciate reforms that restricted women and child labor. Many middle-class reformers did not understand this reaction. Many middle-class reformers believed that the working class should adopt WASP middle-class values, which included the value that women and children should not work for wages.

Moreover, even though they wanted to improve conditions for workers, many middle-class reformers were suspicious of (or hostile to) labor unions because they felt threatened by the idea of working-class autonomy, or working-class solidarity. They were much more comfortable with the idea of the middle class generously bestowing labor reforms upon the downtrodden workers, which is a paternalistic attitude. Working-class reformers, including socialists, recognized this condescending attitude and were uneasy about working with middle-class reformers to achieve labor legislation, though they often swallowed hard and did anyway. There were, however, some examples of fairly harmonious organizations that brought working-class and middle-class reformers together to help workers.

Temperance, then Prohibition - Progressive reformers focused their fight against the consumption of alcohol on the saloons. Saloons were a major center of immigrant culture, for they were not only bars but important social gathering places and where most political machines operated out of. The Progressives war on saloons was motivated by a sincere concern for the real dangers of alcohol consumption and its effect on families, particularly on innocent women and children, and also by a less compassionate anti-immigrant sentiment. Overall, Prohibition aimed at decreasing, if not stopping, drinking by the working class, especially working-class immigrants. Prohibition also had an economic motivation: employers wanted sober, efficient workers.

Kill the Political Machine - Progressives viewed the immigrant’s political machines as corrupt and inefficient. Also, middle-class WASP reformers felt threatened by the power these machines afforded working-class immigrants. Progressives wanted to take the politics (the wheeling & dealing, the personal favors) out of government to make it more scientific and efficient and remove power from the hands of immigrants. They advocated replacing elected officials with appointed experts, such as trained city managers.

Initiative, Referendum, Recall, and Popular Election of Senators - (17th Amendment) These reforms aimed to bring about broader political participation to return power to the people and eliminated corrupt and concentrated power. Some historians argue that middle-class WASP reformers pushed these reforms because they saw themselves, not working-class immigrants or African Americans, as the people who would gain power. Some middle-class reformers assumed that the working class would not have the time, intelligence, or other resources to participate actively in the political process.

Meat Inspection Act, and the Pure Food & Drug Act - Before the passage of these acts, there was no government agency to make sure that food, drugs, or any other kind of product was safe. The credo let the buyer beware had dominated. But when Upton Sinclair published The Jungle in 1906, which publicized the disgusting methods of meat-packing plants, the public became outraged. Reformers argued that in a complex, technological age dominated by big business, consumers needed impartial government experts to regulate manufacturers, tell consumers what was safe, and eliminate corrupt business practices.

Anti-Trust Regulation- Progressives sought more fairness in the capitalist economy and thought that if businesses became too big and powerful (trusts or monopolies), then they could exploit consumers and workers and drive out small businesses. Progressives believed that the government needed to intervene to regulate the size and power of corporations. Examples of anti-trust laws and government agencies to regulate trusts are the Interstate Commerce Commission (and the Hepburn Act), the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, and The Federal Trade Commission.

Good roads

The most urgent need was better transportation. The railroad system was virtually complete; the need was for much better roads. The traditional method of putting the burden on maintaining roads on local landowners was increasingly inadequate. New York State took the lead in 1898, and by 1916 the old system had been discarded in every area. Demands grew for local and state government to take charge. With the coming of the automobile after 1910, urgent efforts were made to upgrade and modernize dirt roads designed for horse-drawn wagon traffic. The American Association for Highway Improvement was organized in 1910. Funding came from automobile registration, and taxes on motor fuels, as well as state aid. In 1916, federal aid was first made available to improve post-roads, and promote general commerce. Congress appropriated $75 million over a five-year period, with the Secretary of Agriculture in charge through the Bureau of Public Roads, in cooperation with the state highway departments. There were 2.4 million miles of rural dirt rural roads in 1914; 100,000 miles had been improved with grading and gravel, and 3000 miles were given high quality surfacing. The rapidly increasing speed of automobiles, and especially trucks, made maintenance and repair a high priority. Concrete was first used in 1933, and expanded until it became the dominant surfacing material in the 1930s. The South had fewer cars and trucks and much less money, but it worked through highly visible demonstration projects like the "Dixie Highway."

Schools

Rural schools were often poorly funded, one room operations. Typically, classes were taught by young local women before they married, with only occasional supervision by county superintendents. The progressive solution was modernization through consolidation, with the result of children attending modern schools. There they would be taught by full-time professional teachers who had graduated from the states' teacher’s colleges, were certified, and were monitored by the county superintendents. Farmers complained at the expense, and also at the loss of control over local affairs, but in state after state the consolidation process went forward.

Numerous other programs were aimed at rural youth, including 4-H clubs, Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts. County fairs not only gave prizes for the most productive agricultural practices, they also demonstrated those practices to an attentive rural audience. Programs for new mothers included maternity care and training in baby care.

 DECLINE

The Progressive political crusades were overshadowed in 1919 by violent confrontations with Bolsheviks (Communists), anarchists and violent strikes. The crusading element of progressivism thus largely ended, apart from prohibition, although business-oriented efficiency efforts continued. In 1919, Theodore Roosevelt died and Wilson's health collapsed, leaving a void in top leadership. The major new face was Herbert Hoover.

Much less settled is the question of when the era ended. Some historians who emphasize civil liberties decry their suppression during 1917–1919 and do not consider the war as rooted in Progressive policy. A strong anti-war movement headed by noted Progressives including Jane Addams, was suppressed by the Preparedness Movement and Wilson's 1916 re-election, a victory largely enabled by his campaign slogan, "He kept us out of the war." The slogan was no longer accurate by April 6 of the following year, when Wilson surprised much of the Progressive base that twice elected him and asked a joint session of Congress to declare war on Germany. The Senate voted 82–6 in favor; the House agreed, 373–50. Some historians see the so-called "war to end all wars" as a globalized expression of the American Progressive movement, with Wilson's support for a League of Nations as its climax.

The politics of the 1920s was unfriendly toward the labor unions and liberal crusaders against business, so many if not most historians who emphasize those themes write off the decade. Urban cosmopolitan scholars recoiled at the moralism of prohibition, the intolerance of the nativists and the KKK, and on those grounds denounced the era. Richard Hofstadter, for example, in 1955 wrote that prohibition, "was a pseudo-reform, a pinched, parochial substitute for reform" that "was carried about America by the rural–evangelical virus". However, as Arthur S. Link emphasized, the Progressives did not simply roll over and play dead. Link's argument for continuity through the 1920s stimulated a historiography that found Progressivism to be a potent force. Palmer, pointing to leaders like George Norris, says, "It is worth noting that progressivism, while temporarily losing the political initiative, remained popular in many western states and made its presence felt in Washington during both the Harding and Coolidge presidencies." Gerster and Cords argue that, "Since progressivism was a 'spirit' or an 'enthusiasm' rather than an easily definable force with common goals, it seems more accurate to argue that it produced a climate for reform which lasted well into the 1920s, if not beyond." Some social historians have posited that the KKK may in fact fit into the Progressive agenda, if Klansmen are portrayed as "ordinary white Protestants" primarily interested in purification of the system, which had long been a core Progressive goal.

 

REFERENCES

Arthur S. Link, "What Happened to the Progressive Movement in the 1920s?", American Historical Review Vol. 64, No. 4 (Jul. 1959), pp. 833–851 JSTOR 1905118.

Arthur S. Link, "What Happened to the Progressive Movement in the 1920s?" American Historical Review 64.4 (1959): 833–851.

Barry C. Edwards, "Putting Hoover on the Map: Was the 31st President a Progressive?" Congress & the Presidency 41#1 (2014).

Charles Lee Dearing, American highway policy (1942).

Christopher Klein (ed), how gilded age corruption led to the progressive era, History: A&E Television Networks, https://www.history.com/news/gilded-age-progressive-era-reforms (4 October 2024).

Danbom, David B. (April 1979). "Rural Education Reform and the Country Life Movement, 1900–1920". Agricultural History. 53 (2): 464–466. JSTOR 3742421.

David R. Reynolds, There goes the neighborhood: Rural school consolidation at the grass roots in early twentieth-century Iowa (University of Iowa Press, 2002).

Ellen Natasha Thompson, "The Changing Needs of Our Youth Today: The Response of 4-H to Social and Economic Transformations in Twentieth-century North Carolina." (PhD Diss. University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2012). online

Harold U. Faulkner, The Decline of Laissez Faire, 1897–1917 (1951) pp. 233–236.

https://www.britannica.com/summary/The-Progressive-Era-Key-Facts

https://www.britannica.com/event/Spanish-American-War#:~:text=Spanish%2DAmerican%20War%2C%20(1898,western%20Pacific%20and%20Latin%20America.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1899-1913/war#:~:text=There%20were%20two%20phases%20to,shift%20to%20guerrilla%2Dstyle%20warfare.

http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~ppennock/Progressive%20Reforms.htm

Jane Addams, Bread and Peace in Time of War (1922)

John D. Buenker, John C. Boosham, and Robert M. Crunden, Progressivism (1986) pp 3–21

John Milton Cooper, Breaking the Heart of the World: Woodrow Wilson and the Fight for the League of Nations (2010)

Kevin C. Murphy, Uphill all the way: The fortunes of progressivism, 1919–1929 (PhD dissertation, Columbia University, 2013; ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2013. 3552093.) online.

"Progressive Era to New Era". Library of Congress.Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

Marilyn Irvin Holt, Linoleum, Better Babies, and the Modern Farm Woman, 1890–1930 (1995).

Niall A. Palmer, The Twenties in America: Politics and History (2006) p. 176

Patrick Gerster and Nicholas Cords, Myth in American History (1977) p. 203

Paul L. Murphy, "World War I and the Origin of Civil Liberties in the United States" (1979)

Richard Hofstadter, The Age of Reform (1955) p. 287

Stanley Coben, "Ordinary white Protestants: The KKK of the 1920s," Journal of Social History, (1994) 28#1 pp. 155–165.

Tammy Ingram, Dixie Highway: Road Building and the Making of the Modern South, 1900–1930 (2014).

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post